Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Poll: Salmon Kings vs Bombers


vs
Victoria
SALMON KINGS
Dayton
BOMBERS


Place your vote and then feel free to leave a comment as to how you came to your decision. Tell all your friends to drop in and vote! The more voices heard, the more accurate the results!

Poll opening date
Tue Dec 4
Poll closing date
Sat Dec 8


07ECHL | #1H | VICvDAY

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

victoria better win or you guys are fucken insane

Mike said...

The Bombers should have such a cooler logo with a name like that. However, what they do have looks better than a fish wearing a crown. They could have at least put some details in the fish instead of making it just two different shades of gray.

Bombers win this one, but not by much.

Anonymous said...

Dayton's looks like a baseball logo to me.

NHL Jeff said...

Dayton should do something more similar to the Houston Aeros or something...That is ust plain boring.

Anonymous said...

The Bombers used to have an alternate 3rd jersey logo that looked of similar fashion to the Houston Aeros logo, and I thought it was slightly better than what Houston has. I always wanted them to use that as their primary, but unfortunely, they stopped using it altogether. Here is a pic of it:

http://www.logoserver.com/hockey/DaytonBombers4.GIF

Matt said...

A FISH WEARING A CROWN? SERIOUSLY? WORST... LOGO... EVER.

Snarf said...

Dayton' is nothing special, but Victoria has the worst logo in all of sports. A stupid looking fish wearing a crown, you have got to be kidding me.

Anonymous said...

The Fish wears a crown because it is a KING amongst Salmon. DUH!

I find myself voting differently for each league tournament so far...

Something as silly as a Salmon King or Stingray or a Jackal wouldn't have much of a chance for my vote against more classic logos of the NHL/AHL.

The ECHL is ripe with horrible, silly and grade-school crests. As a result I'm often voting for the silliest.

Salmon Kings win.

Skings35 said...

for the salmon kings logo picture please take off the white outlining.

Anonymous said...

Bombers do have a new Logo

Anonymous said...

i think both of these logos are good

Chris said...

Hi all!

victoria better win or you guys are fucken insane

Is that right?

for the salmon kings logo picture please take off the white outlining.

I don't know how else to respond other than "no." Or like this.

The Fish wears a crown because it is a KING amongst Salmon. DUH!

I'm with this guy. Hello?!

Bombers do have a new Logo

Prove it.

i think both of these logos are good

Ah, but the question posed was "which is better?"

Great comments here, guys. Thanks!

Jason said...

Oh my! The fish HAS to win this whole thing!

whistler said...

if dude thinks that a fish wearing a crown is stupid, I hate to see what he has to say about a Lion wearing a crown.

*sigh*

whistler said...

http://daytonbombers.com/images/BGPanelLeftSide.gif

Is this what you were talking about?

blackjackshellac said...

Bombers win this one by a megaton. It's red, white and blue classy as compared to to a fish that's been out on the town too late last night. However, the Bombers B-2 logo is better. Guess it's not the "official" one. Are you listening Bombers????

Anonymous said...

its a salmon you fools KING SALMON FOOLS! original and awesome

Anonymous said...

The King Salmon is THE salmon to catch and eat! Their unis are classic and their logo is simple and clean. You won't see them update every 2 years because mauve is out, ha! Go S-Kings!

scheisskopf said...

I like the originality of Victoria's name and logo, but I just don't think the fish looks that good. I mean, I wouldn't want to make it overly complicated by adding a bunch of stripes or whatever, but I do think it could be made better somehow. Maybe I should put my money where my mouth is and draw something. I dunno. But I like the Bombers' logo in the same way I liked the Rochester Americans' logo- it's classy. Although they could have added, well, a bomb or something.

SENS said...

the bombers cant have a bomb in the logo, it the echl, its not suppose to make sense(or look good)

Graeme said...

HEY CHRIS can you post some concepts of AHL or ECHL i sent you like 4 and i havent seen one. and its not like ive seen any other concepts so... LETS SEE SOME art....please...pretty please.

Anonymous said...

Chris, Yes the Bombers do have a new logo.
http://daytonbombers.com/images/BGPanelLeftSide.gif

That is actually it. I'm a Bombers fan. I know these things.

Anonymous said...

all these echl logo's suck the whl logo's are the best!

Jeremy William said...

It's a fish with a crown! A salmon king! Ha! How is that not winning!?

Flying Sioux said...

The new Bombers logo is neat, but it's not on the jersey, or ECHL website, and only once on the Bombers own website.

Chris can't be blamed for the failure of a club to fully institute the supposedly new logo.

Salmon Kings unfortunately get my vote, but only because it's the more creative of two bad logos.

Flying Sioux said...

By the way, Chris, I am still laughing at your responses to other posts!

Thanks for giving me a good chuckle man!

Chris said...

Chris, Yes the Bombers do have a new logo.
http://daytonbombers.com/images/BGPanelLeftSide.gif

That is actually it. I'm a Bombers fan. I know these things.


Good point, that is a new logo. But that's a secondary logo. I've only ever seen it on the shoulder of the jerseys.

It's funny you bring that up to because the Bombers' marketing director actually emailed me and asked if I would change the logo if she sent me a file. I said I'd consider it but she never sent the file. But maybe we can do a secondary ECHL logo tournament at some point in the future.

Jason said...

Well, this is certainly a miscarriage of justice! LONG LIVE THE BADLY DRAWN FISH WEARING A CROWN~!

You're the winner in my heart, Victoria.